Embezzlement and Gambling… In Connecticut?

After speaking at a recent session following a presentation of gambling as an addiction, I started paying closer attention to this issue.  In Connecticut we have two casinos that opened about ten years ago.  While embezzlement to support a gambling problem has come up in my cases, it hasn’t been as prevalent as one would think with two casinos in the state.

What amazes me more than the gambling is the amounts that can be lost, and with the embezzlements, the amounts that can be diverted from an organization to support gambling without the organization missing the funds.

Case in point comes from an article in today’s Journal Inquirer, a local Connecticut newspaper.  “Woman gets 9 months for thefts.”

The woman in the article was convicted of embezzling $335,000 from a local school lunch program.  She was the director of dining services for the local town, and took cafeteria receipts, concealing the thefts with falsified logs.  The article also stated she lost more than $380,000 over six years gambling at the slot machines.

The real questions I have after reading this article are 1) how much funds flow through this town’s cafeteria services to have been able to loose $335,000 and not miss the funds, and 2) where were the basic level internal controls over cash receipts, collections, entries and deposits to have both prevented this from happening in the first place, and also to have detected discrepancies as soon as they started to occur?

I guess a third question would be fair as well – towns like this town undergo annual financial audits by outside accounting firms.  Given the existence of casinos in CT and the high risks of gambling and embezzlement, why wasn’t such a large theft detected as part of any year’s audit?

Just makes me wonder just how much fraud, theft and embezzlement is occurring as we speak, waiting to be detected or discovered, or more likely, waiting for accidental identification after the snowball effect has occurred.

14 thoughts on “Embezzlement and Gambling… In Connecticut?”

  1. Have you ever thought about adding a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is fundamental and all. However think about if you added some great images or videos to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images and videos, this site could certainly be one of the very best in its field. Excellent blog!

  2. You gamble for one reason and one reason only: YOU WANT TO WIN. We all want to win. It’s in our DNA… We’re born predators, born to attack and KILL. But when it comes to “gambling” there are only ever two winners – and neither of them are reading this page now For 99.9999% of punters losing is a fact of life. Click my name to see who the real winner is here!

  3. You areawesome! This web site is really fantastic. I actually wish a lot more folks examine this and get what youre stating, mainly because let me tell you, its essential stuff. I certainly not wouldve assumed regarding it this way unless Id run into your webpage. Thanks for placing it up. I hope you might have excellent accomplishment.

  4. Thank you for your comment.

    We do have several sharing options on the blog. Visitors can:
    1) share the post on Facebook
    2) email the link to a friend
    3) share the post on digg (digg.com)
    4) bookmark the post on delicious (delicious.com) – pretty much the same as spurl.

    When the blog was built we decided on delicious over spurl and furl because it seems to be wider used. Hope that helps.

  5. Steve,

    As usual, good post.

    It seems the old school embezzlers could always hide behind drinking, women or betting. Now, as you have indicated before, this is the age of entitlement.

    Having the gambling establishments in your own back yard certainly makes gambling easier. Ross Perot had it partially correct when he described the “Giant Sucking Sound.” He was referring to the NAFTA legislation. He could have just as easily been describing the casinos in Southern Connecticut. I wonder how much money has gone through their doors this past decade.

    As far as audits go, what can you say? These run the spectrum form the absurd (think Arthur Anderson and Enron) to the (fill in the blank) sloppy ones. One would think organizations would spend more time having better internal controls.

    Keep up the good work.


    Thomas F. Scanlon, CPA, CFP®

Comments are closed.